Document reviews

Reading notes on published documents

Independent copy, layout and page reviews. Each review lists what was checked, what it found, and the evidence behind it, so a reader can verify every claim against the source.

Reviews

School Profile 2026–2027 — grammar & consistency

28 October 2026

29 marks on the two-page profile PDF behind the counselling page: nine reader-visible errors, thirteen punctuation and consistency fixes, three wording clarifications, and four figures that do not agree — including a credit table that sums to 225 while the text says 230.

29 markscorrected draftPDF

The School Profile page — site review

29 October 2026

21 findings: 13 about the page itself — no revision date, a grammar error in its most prominent question, heading-outline and anchor problems, the profile living on a third-party file host rather than the school's own server, a language switcher that covers the accessibility note on a phone — plus 8 on the FAQ copy, including a pronoun with the wrong antecedent and two answers that contradict each other on whether the profile affects admission.

21 findingsFAQ copyhostingaccessibilitymobile

Documents

School Profile 2026–2027 — corrected draft (PDF)

2 pages · 128 KB

The current revision with all 29 copy fixes applied, laid out to the original two-page structure. Changed wording is highlighted and numbered to the review; three items are carried as editor notes because they need a policy or data decision. A review draft, not the school's published document.

correctedprint-ready